C2 Performance Advising — The 3 I's of Performance™

The Chain Has Five Links.
The 3 I's Are How You Read It.

The Performance Chain explains how results are produced. The 3 I's give leaders and core talent the three questions that read the chain — at any altitude, in any conversation, without needing the full model.

Explore the framework
The Evolution
From Competency Libraries to Three Questions

Traditional performance management buries organizations under 15-30 generic competencies. C2 replaces those with 10 validated trait families — the diagnostic layer, measured through LeadView at Level™. But even 10 traits can be complex for daily coaching. The 3 I's distill those traits into three actionable questions that any leader or core talent can use in any conversation.

The Old Model

  • 15-30 generic competencies per role
  • Annual review scores nobody trusts
  • Backward-looking: "what happened last quarter"
  • Measures activity volume, not behavioral signal
  • One-size-fits-all across every altitude
  • Managers coach to the form, not the person
vs
shift

C2: 10 Traits → 3 I's

  • 10 trait families measured through LeadView at Level™
  • 3 I's distill those traits into coaching questions
  • Forward-looking: "what conditions are you creating"
  • Reads the chain from the source
  • Calibrated by altitude — Executive, Core Leader, Core Talent
  • Leaders coach with the 3 I's; core talent self-governs with them
The 10 trait families are what C2 measures. The 3 I's are how you use that measurement — in every coaching conversation, at every altitude, without needing the full diagnostic model in front of you.
Anchored to the Chain
Where Each I Reads the Chain

C2 measures 10 trait families through LeadView at Level™ — that's the diagnostic layer. The 3 I's sit on top of that measurement as the coaching and self-governance layer, organizing those traits into three questions that map directly to the Performance Chain: Traits → Behavior → Conditions → Activity → Performance.

Link 01
Traits
Link 02
Behavior
Link 03
Conditions
Link 04
Activity
Link 05
Performance
Initiative reads Traits → Behavior
Are you beginning — or waiting? Initiative reads whether behavioral defaults are translating into action. The first observable signal in the chain.
🔗
Influence reads Behavior → Conditions
Is your effort connecting — or staying siloed? Every interaction carries a positive or negative charge. Influence reads whether behavior is depositing trust and creating healthy conditions — or withdrawing it.
🎯
Impact reads Conditions → Performance
Did the chain produce durable results? Impact reads whether conditions translated into meaningful outcomes — not just tasks completed, but results that matter.
Two Altitudes, One Framework
Leaders Coach With It.
Core Talent Self-Governs With It.

Click each lever to explore both altitudes — how leaders use it to read and develop people, and how core talent uses it to own their own signal.

InitiativeTraits → Behavior
🔗InfluenceBehavior → Conditions
🎯ImpactConditions → Performance

Initiative — Are You Beginning or Waiting?

Reads:TraitsBehaviorThe ability to act with ownership and move forward without waiting to be prompted.
Leader: Coaching With It

Creating Conditions for Initiative

Your coaching question: "Is this person beginning — or waiting for permission?" If they're waiting, the question isn't about them. It's about you. Are you setting clear enough direction that people can act without asking?

Coaching signal: When was the last time a direct report acted on something significant without asking you first — and it was the right call?
Core Talent: Self-Governing

Beginning Without Being Directed

Your self-check: "Am I starting — or am I waiting for someone to tell me?" Initiative is the single clearest signal of career trajectory. It's the reflex to see something that needs doing and own it.

Self-governance signal: In the last month, what have you done that wasn't in your job description, wasn't assigned, and wouldn't appear in any metric — but made things better?

Influence — Every Interaction Carries a Charge

Reads:BehaviorConditionsThe ability to build alignment, trust, and shared direction — or erode it.
Influence isn't neutral. Every interaction you have carries either a positive or negative charge. There is no zero. When you show up prepared, follow through on a commitment, or help a peer without being asked — that's a deposit. When you show up distracted, drop a handoff, or respond with frustration under pressure — that's a withdrawal. The people around you are keeping a running balance whether they know it or not. That balance is your Influence score.
Positive Influence
Follows through on commitments. Offers help before being asked. Stays composed under pressure. Communicates with clarity. Makes people around them more effective. Deposits trust. Conditions improve for everyone in their orbit.
Negative Influence
Drops commitments. Responds with frustration under pressure. Creates confusion through inconsistency. Makes people work around them rather than with them. Withdraws trust. Conditions degrade for everyone nearby.
The compound effect: Positive interactions compound into trust — and trust is the currency of Influence. Negative interactions compound into avoidance — and avoidance is the death of it. One sharp response under pressure can erase weeks of positive deposits. The math is not symmetrical. Negative charges carry more weight than positive ones. This is why consistency under pressure — not charm in good conditions — is the real measure of Influence.
Leader: Coaching With It

Reading the Charge

Your coaching question: "Is this person depositing or withdrawing trust in their daily interactions?" Don't ask about big moments. Ask about the pattern across fifty small ones. The person who is positive in meetings but sharp in hallways has a net-negative Influence score — and the people around them know it before any review captures it.

Coaching signal: Do people choose to work with this person — or work around them? That choice, made silently and repeatedly, is the most honest Influence metric you have.
Core Talent: Self-Governing

Owning Your Charge

Your self-check: "In my last five interactions under pressure, was I net-positive or net-negative?" You don't need to be perfect. You need to be aware. The core talent who recognizes a negative interaction and repairs it quickly builds more trust than one who is always pleasant but never accountable.

Self-governance signal: When you had a sharp moment last week — a frustrated email, a terse reply, a dropped follow-through — did you go back and repair it? The repair is the signal. Not the mistake.

Impact — Are You Producing Outcomes or Completing Tasks?

Reads:ConditionsPerformanceThe outcomes and value delivered that actually matter.
Leader: Coaching With It

Sustainable, Scalable Results

Your coaching question: "Are this person's results durable — or fragile?" Impact isn't just output. It's whether results were produced through healthy conditions or through pressure that will eventually break.

Coaching signal: If this person took two weeks off, would results sustain, improve, or collapse? The answer tells you whether Impact is personal (fragile) or systemic (durable).
Core Talent: Self-Governing

Closing the Loop

Your self-check: "After I deliver something, do I follow up on whether it actually worked?" Impact is the discipline of following your work forward — not just finishing, but tracking whether it produced the intended result.

Self-governance signal: After your last major deliverable, did you follow up on what happened? Not whether it was accepted — whether it worked.
In Practice
The 3 I's Applied Across the Chain

The 3 I's read different parts of the chain. But what does that actually look like in daily work? Click any scenario below to see how Initiative, Influence, and Impact play out at each node — for leaders and core talent.

Read Your Signal
The 3 I's Self‑Assessment

Choose your altitude first — the questions shift because the same three I's read differently at Executive, Core Leader, and Core Talent levels. Then rate yourself honestly: 1 (rarely) to 10 (consistently, under pressure).

I set the vision clearly enough that my organization acts with ownership. I create the conditions where initiative is the default — not the exception.
I translate executive direction into operational clarity so my teams can act without waiting. I remove friction and set priorities that enable ownership below me.
I act with ownership and move things forward without being told. I begin before being asked. I don't wait for permission.
My daily interactions carry a net-positive charge across the organization. The shadow I cast creates trust and alignment — not anxiety. Leaders below me translate my signal clearly.
My daily interactions carry a net-positive charge with my teams. People choose to work with the people I develop. I translate the executive signal without distortion.
My daily interactions carry a net-positive charge. People seek my input, trust my follow-through, and experience me as someone who makes their work easier — especially under pressure.
My organization produces durable results at scale. Performance sustains without my direct involvement because the system — not my presence — drives outcomes.
My team's results are durable. If I took two weeks off, performance would sustain or improve, not collapse. I build capacity, not dependency.
I deliver results that matter — not just tasks. I follow through on whether my work produced the intended outcome.
3 I's Performance Signal
57
Developing Signal
6
Initiative
5
Influence
6
Impact
Take Action
Four Moves That Shift Your Signal

Whether you're a leader coaching your team or core talent governing your own trajectory, the approach is the same. The 3 I's are multiplicative — the biggest gains come from lifting the lowest variable first.

01

Identify the Bottleneck

Which I scored lowest? That's the constraining variable. In a multiplicative system, raising the weakest lever produces more return than perfecting the strongest one. Leaders: ask this about each person. Core talent: ask it about yourself.

02

Design One Behavior Change

Pick one specific behavior — not a goal. Initiative low? Raise one issue proactively per week. Influence low? Ask one peer for feedback before submitting. Impact low? Follow up on one project to learn what happened after handoff.

03

Read It at 30 Days

After 30 days of deliberate practice, re-assess. Not whether you feel different — whether the people around you are experiencing something different. The signal is in their response, not your intention.

04

Anchor Every Conversation

Use the 3 I's as the structure for every performance conversation. Three questions: Where's the Initiative? How's the Influence landing? What Impact is actually being produced? Same framework, both altitudes, continuous signal.

Leaders use the 3 I's to read and develop their people. Core talent uses them to own their trajectory. Same three questions. Same chain underneath. The simplest performance conversation you've ever had.
Your 30-Day Plan
A 3 I's Plan Fits on One Page

This isn't a performance improvement plan. It's a signal improvement plan — one bottleneck, one behavior change, one 30-day cycle. Below is what it looks like in practice. Choose your altitude to see the plan shift.

3 I's Signal Plan
30-Day Cycle — One Bottleneck, One Behavior
Executive
01
Read — Identify Your Bottleneck
Week 0
⚡ Initiative
Score: __/10
🔗 Influence
Score: __/10
🎯 Impact
Score: __/10
Use the self-assessment above to score yourself. The lowest variable is your bottleneck. Write it down.
02
Design — Choose One Specific Behavior
Week 1
Not a goal. A behavior. Something observable that you will do differently starting this week:
If Initiative is lowest: "I will raise one issue or opportunity proactively in a leadership meeting this week — before it's assigned or escalated."
If Influence is lowest: "I will ask one peer for honest feedback on my last decision — and listen without defending."
If Impact is lowest: "I will follow up on one completed initiative to learn whether it produced the intended outcome — not just whether it was delivered."
03
Practice — Execute for 30 Days
Weeks 1–4
Repeat the behavior weekly. Track it simply — did I do it this week? Yes or no. Don't track feelings. Track actions. The goal isn't perfection. The goal is pattern change that others can observe.
04
Re-Read — Measure the Signal Change
Day 30
Re-score all three I's. But here's the real test: ask someone who works with you whether they've noticed a difference. The signal is in their experience, not your self-assessment. If the bottleneck has moved — pick the new lowest variable and start the next 30-day cycle.
That's the entire plan. One bottleneck. One behavior. One 30-day cycle. Re-read. Repeat. No forms, no annual reviews, no competency matrices. The 3 I's make development as simple as the framework itself — because if the plan is too complex to remember, it's too complex to execute.